Abortion / Artificial population reduction
The implementation of the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goals,
pursued worldwide by globalists,
also postulates a right of every woman on the planet to her so-called "reproductive rights"—
which includes the right to abortion (up to birth) for all women.
(UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goal 5, "Gender Equality")
Arguing, for example, that illegal abortions already occur among African women
and pose a greater risk to these women,
the UN demands the lifting of all abortion bans in those regions,
claiming they are discriminatory against women.
The UN argues, for instance, that illegal abortions already occur among African women
and pose a greater risk to them...
In line with these UN globalist goals,
globalist EU politicians also adopted a resolution on April 11, 2024,
calling on member states to include the "right to bodily autonomy and to free,
informed and comprehensive access to sexual and reproductive health" –
which is also to include abortion – in the Charter!
Current situation in Europe
The UN and its radical plans
Earth for All builds upon the report "The Limits to Growth," commissioned by the Club of Rome and published 50 years ago. At that time, scientists used early computer models to show that Earth's finite resources would eventually collapse under the weight of material consumption. Food production would decline, followed by a drastic population decrease. Many people were shocked by the conclusion that exceeding the planet's limits could lead to collapse. In the last 50 years, the world has followed the report's worst-case scenario, and we are beginning to see deep cracks in the Earth system and in societies. With Earth for All, we could have explored even more collapse scenarios, but we believe our future will be built on economic optimism, not despair. The same person, Sandrine Dixson-Decleve, leads both Earth for All and the Club of Rome: Earth for All is not a fringe organization. She developed the ideas that guided the World Economic Forum and the United Nations. Compare, for example, Earth4All's Giant Leap Plan (left) with the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (right). I have to disappoint conspiracy theorists: The main idea behind the plan to reduce the birth rate makes no mention of vaccines, toxic chemicals, or 5G. (I don't have access to non-public information.) The publicly announced plan, rather boringly, boils down to eliminating many reasons for having children. It also sounds like many nice, progressive, feel-good ideas—which have far-reaching consequences! The Earth4All Plan – The U-Turns A few specific points are worth mentioning.
Impoverished people and small-scale farmers tend to have children to help on family farms or as a social safety net for old age. The plan also proposes eliminating poverty by initiating massive economic transfers from rich countries to impoverished ones: Given that women with free time tend to have children, Earth4All recommends strengthening the role of women (with many positive effects), which would allow women to pursue life goals other than having children. Economic growth, with its steady expansion of housing, roads, and resources, also encourages the birth of children who can easily establish a household once they reach adulthood. Instead of economic growth, Earth4All and the WEF advocate for "degrowth," i.e., a reduction in the consumption of resources such as housing and food: Earth4All: The WEF: Following the question "Is degrowth feasible?" WEF experts explain that degrowth makes perfect sense to them: Even degrowth proponents have compelling arguments. The interview quoted Sam Alexander, a degrowth advocate and research fellow at the Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute at the University of Melbourne in Australia. He says degrowth “doesn’t mean we’ll be living in caves with candles.” Instead, it could mean that people in wealthy countries change their diets, live in smaller homes, and drive and travel less. The Earth4All plan has every chance of success. How do we know? It worked in mouse colonies!
The renowned biologist John Calhoun conducted numerous experiments with "mouse utopia colonies," where mice lived in a socialist miniature "mouse city" in perfect equality, without experiencing hunger, cold, or other dangers of life in the wild. (https://sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/mouse-heaven-or-mouse-hell/) Mice usually have a hard life. Humans are driving them to extinction. They are exposed to cold, predators, disease, and other hardships. And yet, despite these dangers, their population seems indestructible! Dr. Calhoun asked: What happens if you place mice in a modern 15-minute city instead of a vulnerable environment, with unlimited food, mouse habitats, and no disease or predators? The result might shock you! It turns out that the mice initially loved it. Officially, the colony was called the "Mortality-Inhibiting Environment for Mice." Unofficially, it was known as Mouse Heaven. Biologist John Calhoun built the colony in 1968 at the National Institute of Mental Health in Maryland. It was a large enclosure—a 4.5-meter cube—with everything a mouse could possibly want: plenty of food and water, a perfect climate, vast quantities of paper to build cozy nests, and 256 separate apartments accessible via wire mesh tubes attached to the walls. Calhoun also examined the mice to rule out diseases. Free from predators and other worries, a mouse could theoretically live there into old age without a care in the world. The eight mice that founded this colony lived carefree lives until they multiplied into a staggering population of 2,200 mice.
Calhoun placed eight albino mice in the 4.5-foot cube. After an acclimatization period, the first pups were born 3.5 months later, and the population subsequently doubled every 55 days. Eventually, this rapid growth slowed, but the population continued to increase, peaking at 2,200 mice in the 19th month. However, the unusual initial success soon became a problem. Frustrated, lonely alpha males, involuntarily celibate mice, and self-isolating females proliferated. Social bonds suffered! Over time, other deviant behaviors emerged. Mice that had been improperly raised or expelled from the nest early often failed to develop healthy social bonds and consequently struggled with social interactions as adults. Maladapted females began isolating themselves like hermits in empty enclosures—an unusual behavior for mice. In contrast, the maladjusted males began grooming themselves all day long—cleaning and licking themselves for hours on end. Calhoun called them "the beautiful mice." And although they obsessively cared for their appearance, these males had no interest in courting females or in sex. The utopian mice had no access to abortions, but many females killed their young or refused to care for them: Many stressed mothers threw their young out of the nest prematurely, before they were mature. Some even attacked their own offspring amidst the violence or abandoned them in other burrows while fleeing, leaving them to die from neglect. In the end, the colony died out completely. There was no shortage of food or water, and no disease occurred. The mice simply stopped reproducing. This result was not due to overpopulation: as the mouse population declined, overpopulation was no longer an issue – but reproduction rates did not rise again until the end of the colony. The utopian mouse city is extinct.
Will humanity become extinct?
Official partner of, among others:
