Migration or when mostly the wrong people come...

The benevolent reception of the needy and strangers is a moral maxim of the Bible.

That goes without saying!

Nevertheless, we must be vigilant and reasonable in following this moral command:

The strangers who come to our country—are they the real refugees,

that is, people who are 'threatened in body and life'? -

Or are they often much more people who are not primarily there to work,

but want to benefit from our social systems?

And if we let too many of these latter ones into the country,

will we still have the capacity to take in real refugees,

that is, people who are actually threatened in body and life?

In this context, one has to know that the globalist UN goals

are extremely migration-friendly and not only want to open borders to people

who are 'threatened in body and life'...

This is shown, for example, by the rejected UN 'Migration Pact', which was clearly rejected in 2024 by the Swiss Parliament precisely because of its overly extreme pro-migration stance.

(see report below)

Switzerland: Pulled the emergency brake four times already (!)...

In recent history, Switzerland has, thanks to its direct democracy, already successfully hit the brakes on uncontrolled EU immigration policy in popular votes four times (!):

2010    EXPULSION INITIATIVE (expulsion of criminal immigrants) passed (against the government and parliament)

2009    MINARET INITIATIVE (no new minarets) passed (against the government and parliament)

2014    MASS IMMIGRATION INITIATIVE (Switzerland can regulate immigration itself) passed

2024    SUPER LIBERAL UN IMMIGRATION LAW clearly rejected (see report below) (against years of preparations in favour of it by the Federal Council...)

Swiss parliament gives UN migration pact a clear rejection

The UN "Migration Pact," a masterpiece of the globalists of recent years,

was so liberally worded that it would have, in principle, allowed every migrant from every country

to take up residence in a country of their choice...

The Swiss Federal Council had already approved this treaty in 2018, before, however, the elected representatives in the country demanded that the treaty absolutely had to go before Parliament first... Previously, officials working for Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis had dedicated thousands of hours to this treaty, arguing that the agreement's objectives "align with the priorities of Swiss migration policy."

But a majority of both chambers did not believe these assurances,

so that this globalist masterpiece was sunk by both houses of parliament in 2024!

More and more countries distrust the EU asylum system.

The fact is that today, more and more countries in Europe distrust the EU asylum system,

shaped by the globalist UN,

because they are disappointed with it and believe it is taking in the wrong people...

Since 2015, more than eight million asylum applications have been submitted in the EU. And there is no end in sight under the current EU asylum rules. Therefore, the Netherlands and Hungary recently applied to Brussels to withdraw from the EU asylum system. The Netherlands recently applied to the EU Commission for an exemption to withdraw from the EU asylum rules. The aim is to drastically reduce the number of illegal immigrants. "We must take our asylum policy back into our own hands," declared Asylum Minister Marjolein Faber (PVV).

Hungary has now followed suit and also applied to the European Commission for an opt-out from the EU asylum system. European Affairs Minister János Bóka (Fidesz) is also convinced that stronger national control over immigration is now the only way to curb illegal immigration, which poses a security risk. It is clear that, despite the migration and asylum package adopted by the European Parliament in May 2024, the EU asylum system is still unable to cope with mass immigration and the abuse of asylum law. The number of asylum applications in the EU has recently decreased only slightly, by eight percent. At the same time, the European Commission warns in a confidential report of a new wave of refugees of up to 1.5 million people from the Middle East, which is why asylum figures are "likely to increase further."

The fundamental problems of the EU asylum system persist

This system makes no difference to the parts of the world asylum seekers come from, how many safe third countries they have already traveled through where they could have found protection, and the fact that even under the generous EU rules, more than half have no right to protection at all. This ongoing systemic failure can only be resolved by restoring full sovereignty to nation-states over their immigration policies, allowing them to decide for themselves which and how many people they admit to their territory.

Switzerland: Currently, 73,000 foreigners are receiving unemployment benefits.

Every year, 80,000 - 100,000 more foreigners move to Switzerland,

not including asylum seekers and refugees from Ukraine.